{"id":383,"date":"2006-08-14T17:01:00","date_gmt":"2006-08-14T17:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/newkai.com\/"},"modified":"2006-08-14T17:01:00","modified_gmt":"2006-08-14T17:01:00","slug":"houston-we-have-a-light-rail-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/newkai.com\/2006\/houston-we-have-a-light-rail-problem\/","title":{"rendered":"“Houston, We Have a Light Rail Problem”"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Houston<\/a>In the 1960s Houston, like many U.S. cities, decided to abandon its streetcar network. Thirty years later it decided it wanted it back, in its modern form, light rail. On January 1, 2004, its new METRORail system began operation… And then everybody crashed into it.
\nHouston’s light rail crash rate was
25 times the national average<\/a><\/b> during its first quarter of operations. And what makes this figure even more ridiculous is that the system is almost idiot-proof.
\nAnybody who has ever been to a European city with a tram network will most likely have experienced how cars often share roadway with rail vehicles and cross separated track like it’s no big deal. Every time I drive to work, for example, I have to turn and cross dedicated tram trackage onto a small side road, which has no traffic light or even a warning light to warn me of an incoming tram, many of which are the new ULF trams which apart from a quiet electric hum, make virtually no noise what so ever. It’s simply no big deal.
\nHere’s some of the safety features Houston’s METRORail has:<\/p>\n